(PC) Ford v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20251:24-cv-00532California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCEL D. FORD, Case No. 1:24-cv-00532 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND

SLYVESTER WILLIAMS, DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE

FILING FEE WITHIN 30 DAYS

Defendant. (Docs. 7, 12) 16 Marcel D. Ford, who is confined at Mule Creek State Prison, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, in which he alleges the defendant—an inmate at Kern Valley State Prison —violated his civil rights. (Docs. 1, 2.) Reviewing Plaintiff’s litigation history, the magistrate judge identified four actions that qualified as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 12 at 3.) In addition, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff did “not allege any specific facts demonstrating ongoing serious physical injury or facts evidencing the likelihood of imminent serious physical injury.” (Id. at 5.) Therefore, the magistrate judge found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.