BMO Bank N.A. v. Bring Transport Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20251:24-cv-00809California3,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-00809-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

BE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

THAT THE CLERK’S ENTRY OF BRING TRANSPORT INC, et al., DEFAULT BE VACATED, AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE GIVEN A NEW Defendants. DEADLINE TO SERVE DEFENDANTS 15 (ECF Nos. 10, 12, 25)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS 18 This matter is before the Court on the motion for default judgment filed by Plaintiff BMO 19 Bank N.A., which it later supplemented. (ECF Nos. 12, 25). Because the motion fails to establish 20 that either Defendant—Bring Transport Inc or Gurpreet Singh Bring—was properly served in this 21 case, the Court will recommend that the motion for default judgment be denied without prejudice, 22 that the Clerk’s entry of default be vacated, and that a new deadline…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.