(PS) Barnett v. CA DMV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERTA BARNETT, No. 2:17-cv-1517-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

MOTOR VEHICLES,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Roberta Barnett proceeds pro se with claims under the Rehabilitation Act and California’s Fair Housing and Employment Act (“FEHA”). A motion for summary judgment filed by defendant, California Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”), is before the court. (ECF No. 76.) This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court previously found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g). (ECF No. 77.) For the reasons set forth below, the court should grant the motion and enter summary judgment in defendant’s favor on plaintiff’s remaining claims. BACKGROUND Proceeding through counsel at the time, plaintiff filed the operative second amended complaint (“SAC”) on…