Lampkin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRISHKA LAMPKIN, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-1204-JAM-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral argument by the magistrate judge on May 21, 2024. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On February 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed…