Thomas

Thomas v. Ace Market

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20252:24-cv-02234California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY THOMAS, No. 2:24-cv-02234-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ACE MARKET, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed a complaint initiating this action on August 19, 2024. (Doc. No. 1.) The same day, a summons was issued and an initial scheduling conference was set for January 14, 2025. (Doc. Nos. 2, 3.) On January 3, 2025, in light of the apparent lack of service on defendants and the parties’ failure to file a joint status report as required, the court reset the initial scheduling conference for February 24, 2025 and ordered the parties to file a status report regarding scheduling no later than February 10, 2025. (Doc. No. 4.) Plaintiff’s counsel did not file any report in compliance with the court’s orders and failed to appear at the February 24, 2025 initial scheduling conference. (Doc. No. 9)

The court observes that on February 24, 2025, the same day as the initial scheduling 26 conference,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.