Michael Duran v. M. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202522-17004California665 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL A. DURAN, No. 22-17004

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00538-RM-EJM v.

M. GUTIERREZ, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent-Appellee.

JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, No. 23-15025

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00071-RM-JR v.

BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE,

Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: TASHIMA, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Petitioners Michael Duran and Jeremy Pinson1 were previously incarcerated

at the United States Penitentiary in Tucson, Arizona (USP Tucson). While there,

Petitioners each brought habeas petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking

transfer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.