Baker

United States v. Baker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202523-3534California927 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3534

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00779-PA-2 v.

TERRANCE DOUGLAS BAKER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 21, 2025 San Diego, California

Before: WALLACE, MCKEOWN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges

Terrance Baker appeals from the district court’s resentencing after we

affirmed counts against him for Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to commit Hobbs

Act robbery but remanded “for a reduction in sentence or retrial on” a count for

brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c),

after holding that the firearm was found during an unlawful search and should have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. been suppressed. At…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.