Sigal

Sigal v. Remmers

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202523-3347California519 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEREMY E. SIGAL, No. 23-3347 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-00755-RFB-DJA v.

MEMORANDUM*

WENDY REMMERS; NEDZA,

Sergeant; MICHAEL SWEETEN; JACKSON, Lieutenant; ANNE

CARPENTER; NORDGREN,

Officer; WOODWARD, Officer; SHELLEY CARRAO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jeremy Sigal appeals from the district court’s judgment in

favor of defendants in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Fourteenth Amendment claims against Nevada Department of Corrections

(“NDOC”) and Department of Public Safety (“DPS”) officers. A prior panel of this

court already…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.