Drost

Drost v. Sheridan CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2025D084816California7,350 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/28/25 Drost v. Sheridan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ISA DROST et al., D084816

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. RIC2001107)

SHAMUS SHERIDAN et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEALS from a judgment and postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Irma Poole Asberry, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Steven B. Stevens and Steven B. Stevens for Plaintiffs and Appellants; Jeffrey S. Raynes for Plaintiff and Appellant Isa Drost; Law Offices of Patricia A. Law and Patricia Anne Law for Plaintiff and Appellant Jeffrey Drost. Horvitz & Levy, H. Thomas Watson and Eric S. Boorstein; La Follette Johnson Dehaas Fesler and Ames, Barry A. Vogel and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.