United States v. Orlando Clement
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50189 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:05-cr-00814-
GAF-
ORLANDO CLEMENT, AKA Rab, AKA Seal C, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 8, 2013*
Filed July 22, 2013
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, William C. Canby, Jr. and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY**
Criminal Law
Summarily affirming a criminal judgment, the panel held that the defendant’s claims are foreclosed by United States v. Augustine, 712 F.3d 1290 (9th Cir. 2013), which held that mandatory minimums in the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 did not apply in 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceedings to defendants sentenced before the Act was enacted.
The panel denied the defendant’s petition for initial hearing en banc without prejudice to…