Elmer
Elmer v. Hinkley
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20251:24-cv-00871California199 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 JOHN ELMER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00871-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE CHRISTIAN
V. PFEIFFER AND ROB ST. ANDRE AS
DEFENDANTS IN THIS ACTION
HINKLEY, et al., (ECF No. 22) Defendants. 14 15 On February 27, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of Defendants Christian Pfeiffer and Rob St. Andre without prejudice. (ECF No. 22.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil || Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Christian 22 Pfeiffer and Rob St. Andre from this action without prejudice.