Pitts

Pitts v. Quest Diagnostic Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20251:24-cv-01271California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACY PITTS, as Guardian Ad Litem for Case No. 1:24-cv-01271-JLT-HBK

MARY PITTS,

ORDER STRIKING THIRD-PARTY Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

QUEST DIAGNOSTIC CLINICAL COMPLAINT

LABORATORIES, INC.,

16 Defendant, 17 UNILAB CORPORATION d/b/a QUEST DIAGNOSTICS,

Third-Party Plaintiff v.

T.A.M. PROP. LLC,

21 Third Party Defendant, 22 On February 5, 2025, Plaintiff Tracy Pitts, as Guardian Ad Litem for Mary Pitts, filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, accompanied by an unsigned First Amended Complaint. (Docs. No. 25, 25-1). Plaintiff seeks to amend the Complaint to correctly name Defendant Unilab Corporation d/b/a Quest Diagnostics (“Quest”) and to add Third Party Defendant T.A.M. Prop. LLC (“T.A.M.”) as a defendant. (See Doc. No. 25 at 6). Quest did not file an opposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.