(PC) Hunter v. Sacramento County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, Case No. 2:22-cv-1520-DJC-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is a civil detainee and proceeding without counsel, has filed a motion for reconsideration of the costs assessed against him. ECF No. 39. In August 2024, defendant filed a motion to compel arguing that plaintiff has not responded to any written discovery and failed to appear at his deposition. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff did not file a timely a response, so on October 7, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to (1) to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute, and (2) to file a response to defendant’s motion. ECF No. 30. I also warned plaintiff that failure to comply with the court order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. After plaintiff failed to respond again, I recommended that this action be dismissed for…