(PC) Gray v. Home Depot Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20252:24-cv-02108California709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEE GRAY, No. 24-cv-02108 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER HOME DEPOT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s third motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 12) and motion for 90-day extension of time to obtain full names of defendants (ECF No. 13.) For the reasons described below, both motions are denied. On February 6, 2025, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (ECF No. 11.) The court directs plaintiff to that order for specific instructions on how file any written objections with the court regarding the recommendation of dismissal within twenty-one days (21) of being served with the findings and recommendations. MOTION TO APPOINT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.