(PS) Toepfer v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20252:24-cv-02366California1,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT TOEPFER, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02366-KJM-CSK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 7, 2024, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations denying Plaintiffs Robert Toepfer, Shawn O’Malley, Joan Alford, James Nelson, Pam Nelson, Cassandra Salinas, and Michael L. Mardell’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 3) and dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) without prejudice. (ECF No. 22.)1 The Findings and Recommendations were issued after the Court held a hearing at which all Plaintiffs appeared, and where the Court explained the procedures for Findings and Recommendations, and the timing for the objection period. (ECF No. 20.) No objections were filed to the October 7, 2024 Findings and Recommendations. See Docket. On December 6, 2024, the District Judge adopted the Findings and Recommendations in full, denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.