(PC) Johnson v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20252:24-cv-02412California1,597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE JOHNSON, No. 2:24-cv-2412 DAD CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPUTY GONZALES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 10, 2025, the Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend. On February 3, 2025, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. The Court reviewed plaintiff’s first amended complaint and, for the limited purposes of § 1915A screening, finds that claims one and two of the complaint state potentially cognizable excessive force claims against defendant Deputy Gonzales, escorting deputy at the Sacramento County Main Jail. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. However, plaintiff’s first amended complaint contains no charging allegations as to defendants Sgt. Baker and the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department. Plaintiff also alleges that his third claim is the same as claims one and two, both of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.