Brazil

(PC) Kendall v. Brazil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20252:24-cv-03801California2,753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM KENDALL, No. 2:24-cv-3801 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BRAZIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se, and is currently housed at California State Prison, Corcoran (“CSP-COR”). Plaintiff filed a motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction along with his civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has not yet screened the complaint. On January 24, 2025, the Court requested that the Office of the Attorney General provide a response to plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 7.) Following a brief extension of time, the Office of the Attorney General, by special appearance, provided a response. (ECF No. 11.) On February 26, 2025, plaintiff’s reply was entered on the Court’s docket. As 24 Under the prison mailbox rule, a pleading filed by a pro se prisoner is deemed to be filed as of the date the prison delivered it to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.