Wright

Wright v. City Of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20253:20-cv-07068California876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DEMETRIUS A. WRIGHT, Case No. 20-cv-07068-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 37 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.

12 Demetrius Wright, a former detainee and current state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant police officer Allen failed to properly address his medical needs during questioning, and that Chief of Police Kirkpatrick and the City of Oakland failed to properly train and supervise Oakland police officers including Allen. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment and plaintiff filed a motion to amend to add new defendants and amend his allegations. The motion to amend was denied without prejudice for the new allegations and for the request to add Oakland Police Officers Fiorino and Borgna as defendants. The Court indicated that the motion to amend would be considered during the review of the summary judgment motion. After reviewing the summary judgment filings, this case was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.