Jane Roe MB 87 v. DOE 1, a corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20252:24-cv-09361California2,865 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE ROE MB 87, Case No. 2:24-cv-09361-SPG-RAO 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. REMAND [ECF NO. 13]

DOE 1, a corporation; DOE 2, a corporation; DOE 3, a California 15 corporation sole; DOE 4, a corporation sole; DOES 5 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 18 Before the Court is a Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13 (“Motion”)) filed by Plaintiff Jane Roe MB 87 (“Plaintiff”). The Court has read and considered the parties’ submissions and concluded that the Motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background On August 26, 2024, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Defendants Doe 1, a Utah corporation; Doe 2, a Utah corporation; Doe 3, a corporation sole; and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.