Cecilia Madrigal v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20255:24-cv-02630California1,553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

On July 30, 2024, plaintiffs Cecilia and Manuel Madrigal1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against defendant Garfield Beach CVS, LLC (“Defendant”) and Does 1-50 in the Superior Court of California, Riverside County, arising from allegations plaintiff Cecilia sustained injuries while shopping at Defendant’s store. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1-1, Ex. A, Complaint (“Compl.”). On December 11, 2024, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, and 1446. Dkt. 1. On January 23, 2025, Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 15.

The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion.

II.

BACKGROUND

On July 30, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against Defendant alleging the following claims: (1) negligence and (2) loss of consortium. Compl. The claims arise from allegations plaintiff

1 In order to differentiate between plaintiffs Cecilia and Manuel Madrigal, the Court will refer to them by their first names. Cecilia sustained injuries after falling over a display…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.