Troy Ticey v. Fdic
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202523-35614California862 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TROY TICEY; CYNTHIA TICEY, No. 23-35614
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01110-MJP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank; DOES, 1-30,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 3, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs-Appellants Troy Ticey and Cynthia Ticey appeal the dismissal of
their action against Defendant-Appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(“FDIC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) 9(b) and 12(b)(6).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On March 31, 2023, the district…