Troy Ticey v. Fdic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202523-35614California862 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TROY TICEY; CYNTHIA TICEY, No. 23-35614

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01110-MJP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank; DOES, 1-30,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Troy Ticey and Cynthia Ticey appeal the dismissal of

their action against Defendant-Appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

(“FDIC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”) 9(b) and 12(b)(6).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). On March 31, 2023, the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.