Thomas Shea v. Leland Dudek
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202522-16778California654 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS GREGORY SHEA, No. 22-16778
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00518-CLB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Carla Baldwin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 3, 2025**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Thomas Gregory Shea appeals pro se the district court’s affirmance of the
Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for supplemental
social security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (Act). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We review de novo,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d…