Thomas Shea v. Leland Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202522-16778California654 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS GREGORY SHEA, No. 22-16778

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00518-CLB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Carla Baldwin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2025**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Gregory Shea appeals pro se the district court’s affirmance of the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for supplemental

social security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (Act). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We review de novo,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.