Setondji Nahum v. the Boeing Company

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SETONDJI VIRGILE NAHUM, No. 21-35008

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01114-BJR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

THE BOEING COMPANY; JEFFREY

DILLAMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Setondji Nahum appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment and grant in part of a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff also appeals the district

court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration and his motion to appoint

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). substitute counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…