50 Exchange Terrace LLC v. Mount Vernon Specialty Insurance Co.

Good Law
129 F.4th 1186
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202524-1612California1,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamilton, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

50 EXCHANGE TERRACE LLC, No. 24-1612 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-09557- v.

JLS-MAR

MOUNT VERNON SPECIALTY

INSURANCE CO.,

OPINION

Defendant – Appellee,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 11, 2025 * Pasadena, California Filed March 3, 2025 Before: Susan P. Graber, David F. Hamilton, ** and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Hamilton

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The Honorable David F. Hamilton, United States Circuit Judge for the **

Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. 50 EXCH. TERRACE LLC V. MT.VERNON SPECIALTY INS. CO.

SUMMARY ***

Ripeness / Standing / Insurance Law

The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal for lack of ripeness and Article III standing of an action brought by 50 Exchange Terrace LLC seeking to collect under a property insurance policy. The panel held that the injuries asserted by 50…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.