Willie-Jay Smith-Bey v. Shanelle Hamlin, II

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202523-55788California540 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIE-JAY SMITH-BEY, No. 23-55788

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02600-ODW-PD v.

SHANELLE CSS HAMLIN II; TERRIE MEMORANDUM*

HARDY, Director, Los Angeles Child Support Service Title VI-D agency;

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; JACQUES

C. ADRIEN, CRD No. 2996942; E* TRADE

SECURITIES, LLC; DOES, 1-100,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

MORGAN STANLEY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 3, 2025, 2025** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Willie-Jay:Smith-Bey III ©1 appeals the district court’s order dismissing with

prejudice his first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.