Willie-Jay Smith-Bey v. Shanelle Hamlin, II
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202523-55788California540 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIE-JAY SMITH-BEY, No. 23-55788
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-02600-ODW-PD v.
SHANELLE CSS HAMLIN II; TERRIE MEMORANDUM*
HARDY, Director, Los Angeles Child Support Service Title VI-D agency;
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; JACQUES
C. ADRIEN, CRD No. 2996942; E* TRADE
SECURITIES, LLC; DOES, 1-100,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
MORGAN STANLEY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 3, 2025, 2025** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Willie-Jay:Smith-Bey III ©1 appeals the district court’s order dismissing with
prejudice his first amended…