People v. Chism CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2025D083673California2,943 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 2/28/25 P. v. Chism CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D083673

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCS324638)

WILLIAM RAY CHISM II,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carlos Varela, Judge. Affirmed. Gerald J. Miller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters and Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorneys General, Robin Urbanski and Flavio Nominati, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent. The court granted the People’s motion to consolidate three separate cases alleging one count each, over appellant William Ray…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.