Marriage of J.M. and M.M. CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2025B333991California3,435 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/3/25 Marriage of J.M. and M.M. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re Marriage of J.M. and 2d Civil No. B333991 M.M. (Super. Ct. No. D399269) (Ventura County)

J.M.,

Respondent,

v.

M.M.,

Appellant.

M.M. (husband) appeals an order granting the request of J.M (wife) to permanently renew a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO). Husband contends: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that wife reasonably apprehended the commission of future abuse by husband; (2) husband’s abusive communications to wife were protected by the litigation privilege; (3) the court’s advancement of a hearing date without adequate notice to husband violated his due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.