People v. Scott CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2025B334143California2,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/3/25 P. v. Scott CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B334143

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA100182) v.

FLOYD SCOTT,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Laura R.Walton, Judge. Affirmed. Joshua L. Siegel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

________________________ Defendant Floyd Scott appealed from an order denying resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.75.1 Scott’s appointed appellate counsel filed a brief identifying no issues on appeal and requesting that we follow the procedures outlined in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.