People v. Encinas CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2025C099968California4,304 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

Filed 3/3/25 P. v. Encinas CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099968

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 21FE018165)

v.

ANDREW ENCINAS,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Andrew Encinas guilty of inflicting corporal injury on a dating partner, Maya P. The trial court sentenced Encinas to three years of formal probation and 364 days in county jail. On appeal, Encinas contends: (1) the trial court erred in admitting recorded interviews of his sister by police as prior inconsistent statements, and (2) the prosecutor committed misconduct in presenting evidence and argument regarding uncharged acts of violence by Encinas in violation of the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.