Diab

Diab v. Mid Century Ins. Co. CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2013B241538California4,856 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/23/13 Diab v. Mid Century Ins. Co. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

NAEL DIAB, B241538

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC 466333) v.

MID CENTURY INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Yvette M. Palazuelos, Judge. Reversed.

Glaser Damone & Schroeder and Robert P. Damone for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Archer Norris and Limor Lehavi for Defendant and Respondent.

****** Plaintiff Nael Diab appeals from the judgment in favor of defendant Mid Century Insurance Company (Mid Century) after the trial court granted Mid Century‘s motion for summary judgment. Diab‘s action against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.