Sagonowsky

Sagonowsky v. Kekoa CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2013A135726California3,255 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/23/13 Sagonowsky v. Kekoa CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CHRISTINA M. SAGONOWSKY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A135726

v. CURTIS KEKOA, JR., et al., (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. CIV501548) Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Christina M. Sagonowsky, individually and as Executor for the Estate of Leocadia Sagnowsky (Sagonowsky), appeals after the trial court granted the motion of defendant Curtis Kekoa, Jr. (Kekoa) for disqualification of Sagonowsky‟s counsel, Bradley R. White, for reviewing and utilizing certain attorney-client privileged emails and voicemails, in this malicious prosecution action.1 This appeal is only the latest in an ongoing series of legal proceedings between former spouses Sagonowsky and Kekoa.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.