(PS) Murphy v. Oakland Unified School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., Case No. 24-cv-06874-JSC
Plaintiff,
DISMISSAL ORDER
v.
OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
11 Defendant.
12 On September 25, 2024, Plaintiff—proceeding without attorney representation—sued Oakland Unified School District. (Dkt. No. 1.) That same day, Plaintiff moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 2.) Magistrate Judge Kim denied Plaintiff’s application because it did not provide sufficient detail. (Dkt. No. 6 at 2-3.) Plaintiff did not file another IFP application by the November 4, 2024 deadline Judge Kim set. On November 14, 2024, the case was reassigned to this Court. (Dkt. No. 9.) The Court extended the deadline to file another application to proceed IFP to January 10, 2025. (Dkt. No. 12.) Because Plaintiff did not file an application by the January 10, 2025 deadline, the Court issued an order to Plaintiff to show cause as to why the action should not be dismissed. (Dkt. No. 14 at 2.) Plaintiff was ordered, by…