John Roe DJ 40 v. DOE 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20253:24-cv-09218California1,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN ROE DJ 40, Case No. 24-cv-09218-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING

v. HEARING

DOE 1, et al.,

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiff John Roe DJ 40's Motion to Remand, filed January 21, 2024. Defendant Doe 1 has filed opposition, to which plaintiff has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter suitable for decision on the parties' respective written submissions,1 VACATES the hearing scheduled for March 14, 2025, and rules as follows. In his Complaint, filed in state court on August 26, 2024, plaintiff, who states he is a "resident" of California and "over the age of 40," alleges he was the "victim of unlawful sexual assault, molestation, abuse, and other extreme misconduct" by an individual identified as "Perpetrator Smith." (See Compl. ¶ 3.) According to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.