Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01379-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER TERMINATING THE CROSS-
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
v. JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
TO RENEWAL
SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 62, 77 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ state law claims. Dkt. Nos. 62, 77. For the reasons discussed below, both motions are TERMINATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL. The Court recited the factual and litigation history of this matter in its first order addressing these motions, and it will not repeat that background here. See Dkt. No. 93; Rodriguez v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Auth., No. 23-CV-01379-HSG, 2024 WL 4778049, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2024). As relevant here, Plaintiffs brought eight claims against Defendant Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (“VTA”)—a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the Free…