Ecasali

Ecasali v. McMillin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20253:24-cv-02489California2,068 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOUREDDINE ECASALI, Case No. 24-cv-02489-BAS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1. GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

SCOTT MCMILLIN, et al., PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2); Defendants. 2. DISMISSING THE

COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND; AND 3. DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL (ECF No. 3)

Plaintiff files suit against eighteen Defendants, both corporate and individual, without distinguishing between Defendants, alleging violations of the Federal Fair Housing Act, California Fair Housing Act, and the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) Simultaneously, Plaintiff files a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2) and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3). The Court finds Plaintiff has made a sufficient showing of poverty and GRANTS 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.