Ecasali
Ecasali v. McMillin
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20253:24-cv-02489California2,068 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOUREDDINE ECASALI, Case No. 24-cv-02489-BAS-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. 1. GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA
SCOTT MCMILLIN, et al., PAUPERIS (ECF No. 2); Defendants. 2. DISMISSING THE
COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND; AND 3. DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL (ECF No. 3)
Plaintiff files suit against eighteen Defendants, both corporate and individual, without distinguishing between Defendants, alleging violations of the Federal Fair Housing Act, California Fair Housing Act, and the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) Simultaneously, Plaintiff files a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2) and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3). The Court finds Plaintiff has made a sufficient showing of poverty and GRANTS 28 …