Dillon

Dillon v. Nguyen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20254:24-cv-04735California2,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LATONYA DILLON, Case No. 24-cv-04735-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

OFFICER NGUYEN, et al., Re: ECF No. 23 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) by Defendants Officer Nguyen, Officer Caballero, Officer Hiller, Officer Leichliter, Officer Rodriguez, Officer Rossi, Officer Vukasinovic, Sergeant Perez-Angeles, Sergeant Fowler, and Sergeant Rowbotham, all of the Oakland Police Department (collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 23. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiff Latonya Dillon brings this civil rights action against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging claims for fabrication of evidence and malicious prosecution. ECF No. 20. Dillon claims she was wrongfully arrested and prosecuted for multiple charges stemming from the criminal conduct of her brother,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.