Bonilla

Bonilla v. Plourd

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20253:25-cv-00166California2,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-0166-BAS-VET

CDCR #J-48500,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY vs. FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 14 28 U.S.C. 1914(a)

CHRISTOPHER J. PLOURD;

RUTH BERMUNDEZ MONTENEGRO;

L. BROOKS ANDERHOLDT;

JOHN DOE 1-1000,

17 Defendants.

19 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at California Medical Facility, has filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a request for judicial notice. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) Plaintiff seeks to “void” his Alameda County Superior Court criminal judgment of conviction and seeks punishment for those whom he claims violated his due process rights and violated the federal Constitution by failing to declare that judgment void. (ECF No. 1 at 2–4.) Plaintiff has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) in this matter, nor has he paid the initial civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.