Patterson

Patterson v. Six Flags Theme Parks Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20252:21-cv-02398California4,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Melvin Patterson, No. 2:21-cv-02398-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER AND v. PERMANENT INJUNCTION Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc., et al, 1S Defendants. 16 On November 15, 2024, the court found Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., Six Flags Entertainment Corp., and Park Management Corp. (collectively, “Six Flags”) liable for violations 19 of Title II] of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189, and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51, for failing to accommodate plaintiff Melvin Patterson’s hearing disability. See generally ECF No. 84. The court granted permanent injunctive relief and ordered the parties to meet and confer on the scope of the injunction, 23 Patterson to submit a proposed injunction, Six Flags to file a response and Patterson a reply. See 24 id. at 19-20. The parties have made these filings. See Pl.’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.