Covello

(PC) Castro v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20252:24-cv-00928California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH ANTHONY CASTRO, No. 2:24-cv-0928 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND PATRICK COVELLO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is before the court for screening. As in his amended complaint, plaintiff complains about instances in which his mail was opened outside of his presence by prison officials…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.