Quiring

(PC) Jones v. Quiring

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20252:24-cv-01933California956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYON JONES, Case No. 2:24-cv-1933-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. QUIRING, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against defendants Quiring and Covello, alleging that his due process rights were violated in connection with a disciplinary hearing. ECF No. 11 at 3. The complaint, as articulated, still fails to state a cognizable claim against any defendant. I will dismiss the complaint and give plaintiff one final opportunity to amend. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a 27 28 claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.