Frackel

(PC) Raridon v. Frackel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20252:24-cv-02920California2,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN M. RARIDON, Case No. 2:24-cv-2920-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FRACKEL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this § 1983 action against Fackrell, Banger, and Harrison—correctional officers at plaintiff’s current and former correctional institutions—alleging that defendants violated his due process rights during a disciplinary hearing and when evaluating his inmate grievance. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff fails to state cognizable claims against Banger and Harrison but does state a potentially colorable due process claim against Fackrell based on Fackrell’s actions during plaintiff’s disciplinary hearing. Plaintiff may, if he chooses, file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies noted herein, or proceed only 25 26 1 Plaintiff originally identified Fackrell as Frackel. ECF No. 1 at 1-2. Plaintiff has moved this court to correct that spelling error. ECF No. 8. I grant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.