Bowers

United States v. Bowers

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202523-902California1,231 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-902 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:19-cr-00051-TOR-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JACKSON DANIEL BOWERS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 20, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Jackson Daniel Bowers appeals the district court order

revoking his supervised release and imposing a new sentence.1 We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Bowers’ claim that Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution guarantees the right to a jury trial in supervised release revocation proceedings is addressed in a concurrently filed opinion. 1. Bowers claims that the district court admitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.