Cory White v. Ron Krantz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202523-15419California532 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CORY JAMES WHITE, No. 23-15419

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00892-ADA-GSA v.

RON KRANTZ; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Ana de Alba, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 4, 2025**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Cory James White appeals pro se the district court’s

judgment dismissing with prejudice on screening his action under 42 U.S.C. §

1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Long v. Sugai,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 91 F.4th 1331,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.