Bondi
Acyole Campos v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202524-468California1,114 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIELLE ACYOLE CAMPOS, et al., No. 24-468 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-642-240
A220-642-241
v.
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 5, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: M. SMITH and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and WU, District Judge***
Danielle Acyole Campos and her minor son (“Petitioners”), natives and
citizens of Brazil, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. 1 decision affirming the order of an Immigration Judge denying an application…