Bondi

Acyole Campos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 202524-468California1,114 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIELLE ACYOLE CAMPOS, et al., No. 24-468 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-642-240

A220-642-241

v.

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and WU, District Judge***

Danielle Acyole Campos and her minor son (“Petitioners”), natives and

citizens of Brazil, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. 1 decision affirming the order of an Immigration Judge denying an application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.