Santiesteban

(PC) Valenzuela v. Santiesteban

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20251:20-cv-01093California475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO A. VALENZUELA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01093-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER LIFTING STAY OF ACTION

PENDING RESOLUTION OF PLAINTIFF’S

v. CRIMINAL CASE

SANTIESTEBAN, et al., (ECF No. 38)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mario A. Valenzuela (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Santiesteban, Rodriguez, and Alejo for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant Perez for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from the incident on June 22, 2019. On April 9, 2021, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to stay this civil action until Plaintiff’s criminal charges in Kings County Superior Court, case number 20CM-1621, arising from the same June 22, 2019 incident involved in this action, were resolved. (ECF No. 38.) Defendants were directed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.