Mora

Mora v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20253:22-cv-01431California631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 VICTOR MORA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-1431-RSH-LR

CDCR #T-88372,

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE

Plaintiff, JUDGE’S REPORT AND vs. RECOMMENDATION AND

GRANTING SUMMARY

TOR ROBINSON, Medical Doctor; JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANTS NATHAN WILLIAMS, Medical Doctor,

17 [ECF No. 39] Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Victor Mora (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil action 20 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights 21 by failing to provide adequate medical care. See ECF No 1. The Court dismissed the action 22 without prejudice on October 21, 2022, because Plaintiff had not paid the civil filing fee 23 and had not filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 5. On November 24 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed IFP. ECF No. 6. In granting Plaintiff’s IFP 25 motion, the Court screened the Complaint and dismissed certain defendants. ECF No. 7. 26 What remains …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.