Roderick Washington v. Richard Brumfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20252:24-cv-09870California1,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:24-cv-09870-CBM-MAA Date: March 4, 2025 Title: Roderick Washington v. Richard Brumfield

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

Cindy Delgado N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause re: Apparent Defects in Petition

On November 5, 2024, Petitioner Roderick Washington, acting pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition,” ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges that Petitioner is entitled to federal habeas relief because he was not afforded due process when he was denied parole on or around October 31, 2024. (Id. at 5.)

The Petition appears to suffer from certain procedural defects that must be addressed by Petitioner so that the Court may determine whether he will be permitted to proceed with this action. These potential defects are listed below. The Court ORDERS Petitioner to respond to the following issues by no later than April 3, 2025.

Wholly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.