John Roe EB 67 v. DOE 1

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20252:24-cv-09516California2,891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN ROE EB 67, Case No. 2:24-cv-09516-SPG-JPR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 v. REMAND [ECF NO. 13]

DOE 1, a corporation; DOE 2, a corporation; DOE 3, an entity of unknown 15 form; and DOES 4 to 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13-1 (“Motion”)) filed by Plaintiff John Roe EB 67 (“Plaintiff”). The Court has read and considered the Motion and concluded that it is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brought this action in Ventura County Superior Court on August 23, 2024. (ECF No. 1-1 (“Complaint”)). The Complaint identifies three Defendants: Doe 1, a Utah corporation; Doe 2, a Utah corporation; and Doe 3, an entity of unknown form with principal place of business in Thousand Oaks, California …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.