John Roe CS 88 v. DOE 1, a corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20252:24-cv-11154California4,777 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Lisa Dearden Trépanier (SBN 156302) LisaT@trepaniertajima.com 2 Lisa M. Dale (SBN 194688) lisa.dale@trepaniertajima.com Patrick Y. Yoo (SBN 302282) 4 Patrick@trepaniertajima.com TRÉPANIER TAJIMA LLP 4605 Lankershim Blvd., Suite 540 6 North Hollywood, California 91602 Telephone: (323) 487-1101

8 Attorneys for Defendants DOE 1 and DOE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 John Roe CS 88, Case No. 2:24-cv-11154 JFW (SSCx) 13 District Judge John F. Walter Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Stephanie S.

Christensen v.

DISCOVERY MATTER DOE 1, a corporation; DOE 2, a

corporation; DOE 3, an entity of [PROPOSED] ORDER RE unknown form; and DOES 4 to 100, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER1

Inclusive,

20 Defendants.

25

27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen’s Procedures as of 24 July 28 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Purposes and Limitations.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.