Latanya Williams v. Catcafe Lounge

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20252:25-cv-00658California2,988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 2:25-cv-00658-MEMF-MAR

LATANYA WILLIAMS,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER v. PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS

CATCAFE LOUNGE; ENZO

RICCIARDELLI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

LIFETIME BENEFIT TRUST FOR

RAFFAELE RICCIARDELLI Defendants.

19 20 Before the Court is the Response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause Regarding Supplemental Jurisdiction filed by Latanya Williams. ECF No. 10. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Latanya Williams’s state law claims and DISMISSES the claims. 25 26 / / / / / / I. Background A. Factual Background1 Plaintiff Latanya Williams (“Williams”) suffers from paraplegia, and requires a wheelchair while traveling in public. Compl. ¶ 1. Defendants Cat Café Lounge and Enzo Ricciardelli are the real property owners, business operators, lessors and/or lessees of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.